Trump Administration Bars the Esteemed and Well-Established Associated Press from Reporting in the Oval Office or Air Force One... This Cannot Be Done!

Trump Administration Bars the Esteemed and Well-Established Associated Press from Reporting in the Oval Office or Air Force One... This Cannot Be Done!

                    full article written by Ben Bussewitz

The Trump Administration is tightening its grip on the free press, banning one of the most-undisputed, acclaimed, and recognized names in journalism from being in the Oval Office or reporting on Air Force One.

This is not the way the free press should be treated.  The Associated Press disagreed with the way in which the White House was renaming historical places, the Gulf of Mexico in particular, and refused to write the-- wrong name-- for it, which the Trump Administration was aimed at ushering in.

According to the Guaridan:

Budowich [the White House deputy chief of staff] said he recognized that the Associated Press’s reporting was covered by the US constitution’s first amendment, which provides for the freedoms of speech and press. But he maintained that “does not ensure their privilege of unfettered access to limited spaces, like the Oval Office and Air Force One”.

Then why did Budowich say he knows the first amendment?  We see he sees that: it provides freedoms of speech and press.  He does not know a free press and free speech is protected in those two places, we see.

..

..

This, he claims to be, true-- and the basis for why the Associated Press is now unable to be in those two aforementioned places is because-- the White House disagrees with its honest reporting.

The White house sees that disagreed honest important reporting will not be allowed in the Pentagon soon, of course, or the Capital building then for America.  Because this attack on the free press, seems to be its first outlawing and disestablishing of the free press and freedom of speech: the governing official has said that he is not allowing, on behalf of the Mr. Trump Administration, well, then, the honest press to see the president for its reporting (The Oval Office) or do oversee its president's top tier of the Air Force where the president goes (Air Force One).  (And we see this is because he is against and wants to change the name The Gulf of Mexico.)

The White House is basically, exactly, saying to the Associated Press: "Because you do not agree with us, you cannot report on us, most of all the president, where he provides the policy of our government, the U.S."

Another point: The oceans are international waters.  The Gulf of Mexico is contiguous and part of the Atlantic Ocean.  Therefore, this is out of the United States jurisdiction to rename.  Well, we see they would definitely have been after the Atlantic, Pacific, Indian, and Mediterranean, and etc.   (They are the people with signs.)

Another point: Amerigo Vespucci in the sixteenth century mapped out and plotted the shores of America, an Italian explorer, who proved Christopher Columbus' hypothesis false that the eastern shore of the Americas was the western entrance to the Far East, the western entrance to Asia.  We see that these names are named after him.  And we named North America and South America after Vespucci, along with the United States of America. Do they have the authority to use his name to change the Gulf of Mexico name to be named after him.  Do they have his will?  Does this will come from heaven?  As those were the places that the will came there from, for the three places named after him, I see. 

- We, the Church Mission disagree, with the Trump Administration.  It is on our behalf of the Church of heaven that this is against the Church of heaven, as this man, Vespucci serves the Lord his God in praise and worship of collective belonging there.  (Thank you for retracting the statement.)

Isn't that sufficient?  Then why would the Trump Administration rename the Gulf of Mexico, 'America Gulf'?  Isn't America simply, decorated enough?  Well, at least if it is named the America Gulf, something no one in the world wants other than the "Trump Administration," not even the majority of the American Government, at least, you could say, Mexico is one of our North American trade partners, and Canada is one of our North American trading partners, and thus, we can celebrate continental unity!  And North America and South America see they are the Americas, of course.  We have enough of America, then, on behalf of the continents.

..

Updated 2 May 2025

Further Addendum:  If the 'Trump Administration' reckons that the international waterway, the Gulf of Mexico is, "America Gulf," they could just go on in that logic and basis of false and fictional and myopic, and criminal, analysis, in adding in: <<and Mexico is 'America's Mexico.'>>  They could!  You could think it was their plan.  It would fit perfectly with their, well, criminal-in-every-way of logic and basis of false and fictional and myopic claim ("America Gulf"), of which renders it baseless.

And then they attacked the Free Press.

They had a reason to say it was not something they said.  They saw it was false statement.  They understood, 1) base, 2) baseless.  And beyond that, it was mean.  And so, also, unspeakable.  And the America government said they must write it (The Associated Press); they did not; now, one of the People's America's most established and authoritative new sources, most popular, cannot, we see get the president's policy.

For more on the courageous fight to continue the free press and honest dialogue between citizens, head to this article by According to Time.

..

We see, well. the press is good.  It is good to publish writing.  And the free press is people's ability to carry out the ways in that we are put together the People, in the Country the United States.  This is how we learn.  What can we do, the People, the Church Mission asks you, as we are a beacon of the U.S.  What will be done to your press, if the Associated Press is not seen as established against our government?  What will happen to other free presses then.

Is free press disestablished?

- article written by ben bussewitz